bb.donnay-software.com

Hello Roger
Add this Modification to when it arrives at the beginning or end of the database not Blink

do case
case nKey == xbeK_UP .AND. !((xData)->(DC_TestBof( ))) && Nolberto Paulino
oBrowse:up()
oBrowse:refreshAll()
case nKey == xbeK_DOWN .AND. !((xData)->(DC_TestEof( ))) && Nolberto Paulino
oBrowse:down()
oBrowse:refreshAll()
case nKey == xbeK_CTRL_PGUP .AND. !((xData)->(DC_TestBof( ))) && Nolberto Paulino
oBrowse:gotop()
oBrowse:refreshAll()
case nKey == xbeK_CTRL_PGDN .AND. !((xData)->(DC_TestEof( ))) && Nolberto Paulino
oBrowse:gobottom()
oBrowse:refreshAll()
case nKey == xbeK_PGDN .AND. !((xData)->(DC_TestEof( ))) && Nolberto Paulino
oBrowse:PageDown()
oBrowse:refreshAll()
case nKey == xbeK_PGUP .AND. !((xData)->(DC_TestBof( ))) && Nolberto Paulino
oBrowse:PageUp()
oBrowse:refreshAll()

I am worried about this on large databases. DC_TestEof() and DC_TestBof() have given me problems in the past when using these functions with a large database full of deleted records. It can cause much slowness.

Ok, DBF provare with 259.904 and 817.919 that has to see his slowness

Another function can generate Slowness in DBF

Paulino Nolberto

digitsoft wrote:Add this Modification to when it arrives at the beginning or end of the database not Blink

what about :hitTopBlock() and :hitBottomBlock() ?

what about :hitTopBlock() and :hitBottomBlock() ?

That is a much better idea. Thanks.